As an active volunteer firefighter for past 33 years, I take a keen interest in the fire service and as such read and participate in a few firefighter forums. Many of them run the gamut from being objective to nothing more then volunteer bashing platforms. It amazes me of the animosity in some forums between volunteer and paid firefighters.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS),
www.bls.gov, volunteer firefighters make up 70 percent of fire companies in the United States which are composed of 100% volunteer membership. Saving American taxpayers billions of dollars each year in taxes, these volunteers place their lives on the line everyday for no salary or real compensation. It is an American tradition that goes back to the 1700’s when Benjamin Franklin formed the first volunteer fire department to fight fires in Philadelphia.
So why is it that such animosity exists between the paid and volunteer forces? Why is the “Brotherhood/Sisterhood” fractured when it comes to employment status? Volunteers, while not compensated in most cases, mainly make a career volunteering out of spirit and a willingness to help out in the community, make a positive difference, acceptance socially and a desire for self satisfaction. Paid firefighters on the other hand are compensated for their services and for many, like their volunteer counterparts wish to make a career out helping people. While you won’t get rich being a paid firefighter, you can live comfortably and know that in 20 years, you can retire with a 50% pension benefit and full medical/life insurance policy. Not a bad deal if you don’t mind working odd hours and holidays.
I asked a friend of mine who is a paid firefighter in Westchester County, New York why, in his opinion, paid firefighters take an adversarial view towards volunteers. He told me first off that not all the paid guys resent volunteers, but there is a vocal minority that reject the volunteer concept as a threat to their livelihood and feel that volunteers do not have the same training standards as the paid crews. In other words, he told me, they feel that volunteers are not their equals. Many all-paid departments refuse to call on neighboring volunteer departments for mutual aid claiming that the level of training that volunteers is inferior to that of the paid firefighters.
While it is true that most volunteers do not have the level of training that paid types have, which I think is around 239 hours vs. 89 for volunteer basic, the volunteer fire service is structured much differently then paid. In the paid world, if you will, there is only one kind of firefighter, one who does all; interior and exterior duties all rolled into one. This is the only concept that many of them can comprehend. However in the volunteer service, by the nature of the employee, you have interior firefighters, exterior firefighters, fire-police, administrative/support-only firefighters and drivers (chauffeurs). It is structured this way because this is what works best as some members do not wish to go into burning buildings, but are fine with exterior work, some only want to do rescue (EMS) related, fire-police or driving of the apparatus. In the eyes of many volunteers, having a paid firefighter man a master stream or performing ground ladder work when he could be utilized as interior is a waste of manpower and resources and is something a volunteer could easily do thus freeing up the paid firefighter for interior duties. But in many jurisdictions, union work rules generally forbid volunteers from working with paid firefighters.
Could it really be that paid firefighters truly view us as a threat? The IAFF has publicly declared that volunteer firefighters are the “enemy” in a recent report to the membership; indeed, they have
forbidden their membership to volunteer in many instances, threatening those who do with sanctions and possible expulsion from the union. Could it be true? My first reaction is no. The main reason for this is that under law if they throw out a member for anything other then non-payment of dues and/or fees, they must be allowed to continue employment with the agency employing them. This would defeat the purpose of persuading them volunteering and also financially crippling to the various locals who would lose the dues money they need to operate. They also risk members resigning from the union and converting to agency fee payer status or even worse, core membership.
The volunteers aren’t perfect angels here either; I personally know a few who resent paid firefighters because they receive monies doing something that the volunteers feel should be done as a community service thus saving taxpayers valuable dollars. Others resent the haughty attitude exhibited by paid firefighters being a mentality of “we’re professional and volunteers aren’t”. Indeed, the forums at times look like the civil war redux where one must duck for cover when reading them.
I think its high time that the paid firefighters who have this anti-volunteer attitude need to re-evaluate their positions on the volunteer fire service and likewise the volunteers who subscribe to “volunteer only” need to stop and realize that paid firefighters have their place, especially in major cities where the amount of alarms makes an all volunteer force unfeasible.
Only when both sides decide to become one and recognize the different concepts and methods of operation, will the fire service finally become what it should have been over the years. That is a band of Brothers and Sisters working together towards a common goal.